Astrology, an ancient system that links celestial bodies to human events, continues to divide society. Some people strongly support it, while others strongly reject it. The fanaticism surrounding astrology, whether positive or negative, can be explained by the “Terror Management Theory” (TMT) and the need to preserve personal choice and free will. This psychological theory looks at how people react to the fear of death and mortality, and the need for freedom and control adds another dimension to the fanaticism against astrology.
The Terror Management Theory (TMT)
Terror Management Theory, developed by social psychologists Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon and Tom Pyszczynski, argues that people, realizing their inevitable mortality, develop cultural worldviews and belief systems that give meaning to life and provide a sense of immortality, whether symbolic or literal. These beliefs act as “shields” against the horror of the awareness of death.
Fanaticism in favour of Astrology
For astrology proponents, this system offers a sense of order and predictability to the world. The idea that the movements of the planets can affect people's lives gives a sense of purpose and connection to something larger than everyday reality. This perception can act as a defense mechanism against uncertainty and fear of mortality.
Astrology also provides a system for understanding personality and luck, which can help people explain their life events and make decisions. This sense of meaning and guidance can boost self-esteem and provide psychological comfort in a world full of uncertainties.
When someone questions astrology, this can be seen as a threat to a fanatic supporter who brings meaning to their life, leading to strong reactions and further fanaticism.
Fanaticism Against Astrology
On the other hand, critics of astrology may see this system as a form of superstition that has no scientific basis and distracts people from reality. But beyond that, for many astrology deniers, the very idea that the planets or any external force can affect their lives is seen as a threat to their personal choice and free will.
The desire for total control over their lives makes the idea that there is something bigger that can influence their decisions extremely disturbing. Opposition to astrology, in this case, is not only a rejection of superstition, but also an attempt to ensure that personal freedom and autonomy remain unquestioned.
Astrology, with its claims about the influence of celestial bodies on people's lives, can be seen as limiting or undermining the ability of individuals to freely choose their destiny. People who reject astrology often do so because they wish to believe that they are the only ones responsible for their choices and their future, and anything that implies otherwise is a threat.
What Justifies Hate?;
Nothing, but let's talk in theory.
Hatred and bigotry, whether for or against astrology, often stems from the need to defend our worldviews that offer us a sense of order, security and purpose. When these worldviews are challenged, people often react with intensity because this challenge can be seen as a threat to their very existence and autonomy. Studies have shown that the more bigoted a person is, the lower their self-esteem. This is because they base their personal worth on things beyond themselves. Therefore, when they are challenged, they are indirectly challenged in a way.
The controversy over astrology is not just a debate between rationalism and superstition, but also a deeper battle for existential security and freedom of will. Each side is trying to maintain a sense of order and stability in the world, either through accepting a transcendental belief system or rejecting anything that is not based on logic and science, but also defending the right to absolute control over their lives.
Greek 
English